<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organic and PPC Attractiveness: two new metrics for a scientific SEO strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wingify.com/conversion-blog/organic-and-ppc-attractiveness-two-new-metrics-for-a-scientific-seo-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wingify.com/conversion-blog/organic-and-ppc-attractiveness-two-new-metrics-for-a-scientific-seo-strategy/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bora</title>
		<link>http://www.wingify.com/conversion-blog/organic-and-ppc-attractiveness-two-new-metrics-for-a-scientific-seo-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Bora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 05:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wingify.com/conversion-blog/?p=136#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Organic and PPC Attractiveness are a very good and interesting concept.

But the article is missing one key ingredient - Keyword Relevancy. Deleting entirely irrelevant keywords is important, but the next step is to rate which keywords are most likely going to make money or whatever the sites goal.
Some keywords are directly on it, while others just related and only a part of the searchers will be interested in the kind of products/services your site offers.

I recommend multiplying the traffic volume by a factor (e.g. 100% for directly searching what you have to offer and 50% kind of related) to get the potential buyer volume.
This can quickly change the top targeted keywords.

PS: Don&#039;t try to make perfect estimates. Some rough guessing will do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organic and PPC Attractiveness are a very good and interesting concept.</p>
<p>But the article is missing one key ingredient &#8211; Keyword Relevancy. Deleting entirely irrelevant keywords is important, but the next step is to rate which keywords are most likely going to make money or whatever the sites goal.<br />
Some keywords are directly on it, while others just related and only a part of the searchers will be interested in the kind of products/services your site offers.</p>
<p>I recommend multiplying the traffic volume by a factor (e.g. 100% for directly searching what you have to offer and 50% kind of related) to get the potential buyer volume.<br />
This can quickly change the top targeted keywords.</p>
<p>PS: Don&#8217;t try to make perfect estimates. Some rough guessing will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Mailer</title>
		<link>http://www.wingify.com/conversion-blog/organic-and-ppc-attractiveness-two-new-metrics-for-a-scientific-seo-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Mailer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wingify.com/conversion-blog/?p=136#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Great article, deserves more exposure - well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, deserves more exposure &#8211; well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Coburn</title>
		<link>http://www.wingify.com/conversion-blog/organic-and-ppc-attractiveness-two-new-metrics-for-a-scientific-seo-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Coburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wingify.com/conversion-blog/?p=136#comment-144</guid>
		<description>This is a great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
